The video game world is buzzing with the release of Street Fighter IV. 
It is a franchise that helped usher a generation of gamers into the
fighting genre, and arrives greeted by a wave of emotionally-charged
expectations.  Further complicating any attempts at objective analysis
further is the fact that Street Fighter is rooted in the arcade
tradition.  With the game's release comes peripherals (by the way, it looks like Jorge was right: MadCatz is the pricey one!) that capture the arcade feeling.  Mitch Krpata
of the site Insult Swordfighting raises the important question of how
to analyze games that rely (either implicitly or explicitly) on
peripherals.  We trace a brief history of non-controller pad input
devices and muse on their effects on the games that use them.  As
always, feel free to jump in with your experiences and thoughts.

Some discussion starters:

-Should Street Fighter IV be reviewed a specific way (either arcade stick or control pad)? 
-How much focus should the hardware have in game analysis?
-What do you think of the "fairness" argument: Should games have a
standardized control scheme to ensure a level playing field?  Should
developers ensure that third party peripherals do not undermine this?

To listen to the podcast:

• Subscribe to the EXP Podcast via iTunes here. Additionally, here is the stand-alone feed.
• Listen to the podcast in your browser by left-clicking the title. Or, right-click and select "save as link" to download the show in MP3 format.
• Subscribe to this podcast and EXP's written content with the RSS link on the right.

Show Notes:

-Run time: 28 min 19 sec
-Mitch Krpata's article: "A Peripheral Concern "
-Music provided by Brad Sucks